Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine ; 13(1):11-15, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20244102

ABSTRACT

Aim: During the coronavirus disease, a palliative approach was recommended for the management of endodontic emergencies. This retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of dexamethasone or ibuprofen-acetaminophen combination for pain management in endodontic emergencies. Material(s) and Method(s): One hundred and eight records of patients who presented to the emergency department with dental pain were evaluated retrospectively. Since interventional procedures were not performed during the pandemic period, Specific analgesics/antibiotics for the management of pain were preferred. A follow-up protocol with a questionnaire was developed to observe the effectiveness of palliative treatment and make changes if necessary. All participants received a questionnaire to rate the pain levels 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 hours after taking the drug. All data were collected from the patient file and assessed. After inclusion and exclusion criteria, 32 patients were included (n = 19, ibuprofen + acetaminophen;n = 13, dexamethasone). Data were analyzed using the chi-square test (P = 0.05). Result(s): In both groups, a significant decrease in pain was experienced immediately after medication and at 6, 12, and 18 hours, with no significant difference (P >.05). However, dexamethasone (Group II) resulted in lower pain levels than ibuprofen\acetaminophen (Group I) at 24 and 48 hours (P <.05) Discussion: Both dexamethasone and ibuprofen-acetaminophen can be good palliative choices in endodontic emergencies in pandemic conditions. However, at 24 and 48 hours, dexamethasone resulted in lower pain levels.Copyright © 2022, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.

2.
Kanzo/Acta Hepatologica Japonica ; 63(6):293-296, 2022.
Article in Japanese | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20239409

ABSTRACT

Organ transplant recipients receive immunosuppressive drugs and hence are at high risk for COVID-19 due to their compromised immunity. This study assessed 1,370 liver transplant recipients who were followed at our hospital. A total of 12 patients got COVID-19: 5 recipients <50-years-old had mild disease, 7 recipients >60-years-old had moderate to severe disease, and 2 patients died. In addition, not all patients received 2 vaccinations, suggesting that the immunization is important for COVID-19 prophylaxis even in this patient population. One recipient was successfully treated with a combination of a reduced dose of immunosuppressive drugs, dexamethasone, remdesivir, and antibiotics, which is being established as an effective therapy for COVID-19.Copyright © 2022 The Japan Society of Hepatology.

3.
Acta Haematologica Polonica ; 54(2):82-85, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20235121

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Despite several studies, the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on patients with multiple myeloma remains uncertain. Material(s) and Method(s): We performed a survey that covered the period of the first and second waves of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in 23 centers inseven countries. Out of 352 patients with myeloma and SARS-CoV-2, 23% died. Results/Conclusions: Logistic regression showed a lower risk of death among patients treated with proteasome inhibitor and a higher risk of death for those who had a severe or a very severe course of disease.Copyright © 2023 Sciendo. All rights reserved.

4.
Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology ; 30(9):e178-e186, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20233238

ABSTRACT

Background: At our hospital, people with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) had a high rate of pulmonary barotrauma. Therefore, the current study looked at barotrauma in COVID-19 patients getting invasive and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation to assess its prevalence, clinical results, and features. Methodology: Our retrospective cohort study comprised of adult COVID-19 pneumonia patients who visited our tertiary care hospital between April 2020 and September 2021 and developed barotrauma. Result(s): Sixty-eight patients were included in this study. Subcutaneous emphysema was the most frequent type of barotrauma, reported at 67.6%;pneumomediastinum, reported at 61.8%;pneumothorax, reported at 47.1%. The most frequent device associated with barotrauma was CPAP (51.5%). Among the 68 patients, 27.9% were discharged without supplemental oxygen, while 4.4% were discharged on oxygen. 76.5% of the patients expired because of COVID pneumonia and its complications. In addition, 38.2% of the patients required invasive mechanical breathing, and 77.9% of the patients were admitted to the ICU. Conclusion(s): Barotrauma in COVID-19 can pose a serious risk factor leading to mortality. Also, using CPAP was linked to a higher risk of barotrauma.Copyright © 2021 Muslim OT et al.

5.
Russian Journal of Allergy ; 18(3):5-15, 2021.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2318795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is based on the accumulation of bradykinin as a result of angiotensin-converting enzyme blockade. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) binds to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor, which may inhibit its production and thereby lead to an increase in bradykinin levels. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 infection may be a likely trigger for the development of angioedema. AIMS: This study aimed to analyze cases of hospitalizations of patients with angioedema associated with the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients admitted to the Vitebsk Regional Clinical Hospital between May 2020 and December 2020 with isolated (without urticaria) angioedema while receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. In all patients, smears from the naso and oropharynx for COVID-19 were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. RESULT(S): Fifteen inpatients (9 men and 6 women) aged 44-72 years were admitted because of emergent events, of which 53.6% had isolated angioedema. In two cases, a concomitant diagnosis of mild COVID-19 infection was established with predominant symptoms of angioedema, including edema localized in the face, tongue, sublingual area, and soft palate. All patients had favorable disease outcomes. CONCLUSION(S): Patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema may require hospitalization to monitor upper respiratory tract patency. There were cases of a combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema and mild COVID-19. Issues requiring additional research include the effect of SARS- CoV-2 infection on the levels of bradykinin and its metabolites, the triggering role of COVID-19 in the development of angioedema in patients receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, recommendations for the management of patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema, and a positive result for COVID-19.Copyright © 2020 Pharmarus Print Media All rights reserved.

6.
Flora ; 28(1):56-64, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2291845

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The course of SARS-CoV-2 disease has a clinical spectrum ranging from mild upper respiratory tract infection to fulminant pneumonia. The use of corticosteroids is recommended in the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of high-dose methylprednisolone and dexamethasone treatment in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Material(s) and Method(s): The participants were divided into Group M, receiving >=250 mg intravenous methylprednisolone therapy, and Group D receiving 6 mg intravenous dexamethasone therapy. The efficacy of treatments, length of hospital stays, ventilator requirements, anti-cytokine treatment requirements, and mortality rates were evaluated in both groups. Result(s): Two hundred eighty-eight (69.1%) patients received dexamethasone and 129 (30.9%) received methylprednisolone. While overall mortality in the study was 11%, this rate was 10.4% in Group D and 12.4% in Group M (p> 0.05). The rate of patients requiring intensive care was 15.8% in total, with a rate of 14.6% in Group D and 18.6% in Group M (p> 0.05). However, the total length of hospital stay was nine (7-39) days in Group M and 13 (7-29) days in Group D (p= 0.009). Anticytokines were required in 14.4% of the patients during treatment [40 in Group D, 20 in Group M (p> 0.05)]. Conclusion(s): In this study, it was determined that early methylprednisolone treatment shortened the hospital stay. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between Group M and Group D in terms of mechanical ventilation requirement, which showed an additional positive effect. However, mortality rates in patients receiving dexamethasone were found to be lower than in those receiving methylprednisolone, yet this difference did not reach statistical significance.Copyright © 2023 Bilimsel Tip Yayinevi. All rights reserved.

7.
Hematology (United States) ; 2022(1):197-205, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2274597

ABSTRACT

T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is curable for most children and adolescent and young adult patients with contemporary frontline chemotherapy regimens. During the past decade, improved survival rates have resulted from the optimization of frontline chemotherapy regimens, the use of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment for evaluating a patient's risk for relapse, and the intensification of treatment based on the persistence of MRD. Optimization of initial therapy is critical because relapsed T-ALL after initial intensive chemotherapy is incurable for most adult patients. Current T-ALL salvage chemotherapy regimens are minimally effective, and unlike in B-cell ALL, there are no approved antibody therapies or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies for relapsed disease. Immunotherapy and small-molecule inhibitors are beginning to be tested in relapsed T-ALL and have the potential to advance the treatment. Until effective salvage strategies are discovered, however, intensive frontline therapy is required for cure. In this article I review the current frontline chemotherapy regimens for adult patients with T-ALL, summarize the novel targeted and immune therapeutics currently in early-phase clinical trials, and outline how these therapies are helping to define an optimal approach for T-ALL.Copyright © 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.

8.
Bmj ; 370 (no pagination), 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2267877

ABSTRACT

Clinical question What is the role of drug interventions in the treatment and prevention of covid-19? Recommendations The first version on this living guidance focuses on corticosteroids. It contains a strong recommendation for systemic corticosteroids in patients with severe and critical covid-19, and a weak or conditional recommendation against systemic corticosteroids in patients with non-severe covid-19. Corticosteroids are inexpensive and are on the World Health Organisation list of essential medicines. How this guideline was created This guideline reflects an innovative collaboration between the WHO and the MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation, driven by an urgent need for global collaboration to provide trustworthy and living covid-19 guidance. A standing international panel of content experts, patients, clinicians, and methodologists, free from relevant conflicts of interest, produce recommendations for clinical practice. The panel follows standards, methods, processes, and platforms for trustworthy guideline development using the GRADE approach. We apply an individual patient perspective while considering contextual factors (that is, resources, feasibility, acceptability, equity) for countries and healthcare systems. The evidence A living systematic review and network meta-analysis, supported by a prospective meta-analysis, with data from eight randomised trials (7184 participants) found that systemic corticosteroids probably reduce 28 day mortality in patients with critical covid-19 (moderate certainty evidence;87 fewer deaths per 1000 patients (95% confidence interval 124 fewer to 41 fewer)), and also in those with severe disease (moderate certainty evidence;67 fewer deaths per 1000 patients (100 fewer to 27 fewer)). In contrast, systemic corticosteroids may increase the risk of death in patients without severe covid-19 (low certainty evidence;absolute effect estimate 39 more per 1000 patients, (12 fewer to 107 more)). Systemic corticosteroids probably reduce the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and harms are likely to be minor (indirect evidence). Understanding the recommendations The panel made a strong recommendation for use of corticosteroids in severe and critical covid-19 because there is a lower risk of death among people treated with systemic corticosteroids (moderate certainty evidence), and they believe that all or almost all fully informed patients with severe and critical covid-19 would choose this treatment. In contrast, the panel concluded that patients with non-severe covid-19 would decline this treatment because they would be unlikely to benefit and may be harmed. Moreover, taking both a public health and a patient perspective, the panel warned that indiscriminate use of any therapy for covid-19 would potentially rapidly deplete global resources and deprive patients who may benefit from it most as potentially lifesaving therapy. Updates This is a living guideline. Work is under way to evaluate other interventions. New recommendations will be published as updates to this guideline. Readers note This is version 1 of the living guideline, published on 4 September (BMJ 2020;370:m3379) version 1. Updates will be labelled as version 2, 3 etc. When citing this article, please cite the version number. Submitted August 28 Accepted August 31Copyright © Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to.

9.
Clinical Immunology Communications ; 3:46-50, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2266269

ABSTRACT

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) deficiency is a primary immunodeficiency associated with recurrent hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) episodes. The clinical phenotypes of XIAP deficiency vary, ranging from splenomegaly to life-threatening inflammation. We report a case of XIAP deficiency with unusual late-onset HLH presentation likely triggered by a drug allergy. A previously healthy adolescent boy presented to the hospital with fever and rash seven days after starting antibiotics for a neck abscess. Laboratory evaluation demonstrated cytopenias, elevated liver enzymes, and increased inflammatory markers. Initially, antibiotics were discontinued due to concern for drug rash. He continued to deteriorate clinically and became hypotensive. Additional testing revealed decreased NK cell function, as well as elevated ferritin, triglycerides, and soluble IL-2 receptor. SLAM-Associated Protein (SAP) and XIAP evaluation by flow cytometry demonstrated decreased XIAP expression. Subsequently, genetic testing revealed a known pathogenic mutation in BIRC4 (c.421_422del), confirming the diagnosis of XIAP deficiency.Copyright © 2023

10.
Coronaviruses ; 3(2):10-22, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2266130

ABSTRACT

Background: Currently, the present world is facing a new deadly challenge from a pandemic disease called COVID-19, which is caused by a coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2. To date, no drug or vaccine can treat COVID-19 completely, but some drugs have been used primarily, and they are in different stages of clinical trials. This review article discussed and compared those drugs which are running ahead in COVID-19 treatments. Method(s): We have explored PUBMED, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, as well as press releases of WHO, NIH and FDA for articles related to COVID-19 and reviewed them. Result(s): Drugs like favipiravir, remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin, corticosteroids and interferons have been found effective to some extent, and partially approved by FDA and WHO to treat COVID-19 at different levels. However, some of these drugs have been disapproved later, although clinical trials are going on. In parallel, plasma therapy has been found fruitful to some extent too, and a number of vaccine trials are going on. Conclusion(s): This review article discussed the epidemiologic and mechanistic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2, and how drugs could act on this virus with the comparative discussion on progress and drawbacks of major drugs used till date, which might be beneficial for choosing therapies against COVID-19 in different countries.Copyright © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers.

11.
Coronaviruses ; 3(1):49-55, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2259259

ABSTRACT

Liver enzyme abnormalities occur frequently in patients diagnosed with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It has been suggested that patients with severe acute liver injury are more likely to be admitted to intensive care, require intubation or renal replacement therapy and their mortality rate is higher than patients without severe acute liver injury. This review article explores the possible aetiologies of liver dysfunction seen in patients with COVID-19 and also the effect of COVID-19 on patients with pre-existing liver disease. Finally, we suggest clinical approaches to treating a patient with liver enzyme disturbance and COVID-19 and also caring for patients who require liver transplantation in the COVID-19 era.Copyright © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers.

12.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results ; 13:656-668, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2256373

ABSTRACT

COVID- 19 was the most challenging public health problem worldwide for better part of 2 years (2019 - 2021). Although several of the medication have not demonstrated promising benefits in the majority of research, they are nonetheless utilized. The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the hospital pharmaceutical care of COVID-19 patients by sex, age group, and with regards to oxygen consumption classifying and grouping them with comorbidities seen and auxiliary medication given . Hospital based retrospective observational study was conducted among 123 patients with antigen positive Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction confirmed COVID- 19 infection admitted in the ICU for 24 hours prior. As the age increased the chance for ICU admission also increased. The most affected age group was above 50 years of age. The total number of patients requiring oxygen was 100% in COVID- 19 ICU patients. Some of the most common comorbidities were heart disease (18%) followed by Diabetes Mellitus (15%) and Hypertension (15 %). Only 48 % of patients received antivirals. Remdesivir which was the mainstay antiviral was given (41%). Amoxicillin and clavulanate combination (Augmentin 625 mg) was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic (27%).The antipyretic of choice was paracetamol which was given to 100% of patients. Almost all patients (78%) were given enoxaparin sodium as the anticoagulant of choice. Regardless of equivocal results, multivitamins and supplements were recommended to all patients. All prescription guidelines as given by ICMR for COVID- 19 ICU patients were followed with the exception of the extensive antimicrobial use.Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.

13.
14.
Neuroimmunology Reports ; 2 (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2285849

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Post-COVID-19 autoimmune encephalitis is a rare manifestation following COVID-19. Most cases have not demonstrated solid evidence regarding their pathogenesis. Some believe it to be an immune process. Case presentation: In this case report, we present a case of a young female who presented to our emergency department with visual, auditory, and olfactory hallucinations after successfully treating COVID-19 two weeks prior to this visit. On examination, her vital signs were stable, but she was agitated, distressed, and hallucinating. Neurological examinations were normal. Laboratory investigations, including autoimmune profiles, were all negative. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed non-specific changes in the bilateral frontal area. Electroencephalography (EEG) showed lateralized rhythmic delta activity (LRDA) arising more from the right occipital lobes. Autoimmune psychosis was suspected due to psychosis, abnormal imaging, and abnormal EEG findings. She was given corticosteroids and antipsychotic medication. Her symptoms improved within ten days. On follow-up, she remained well without any return of psychosis. Conclusion(s): Possible autoimmune pediatric encephalitis following COVID-19 is a rare entity that has scarcely been reported. The majority of the cases were reported to have been related to stress following the infection. To establish the correct diagnosis, an extensive workup, including an autoimmune profile, lumbar puncture, magnetic resonance imaging, and electroencephalography, is recommended.Copyright © 2022 The Author(s)

15.
Critical Care and Shock ; 26(1):27-32, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2263685

ABSTRACT

The medical world has been seeking solutions in solving the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak since 2019. Amongst several alter-natives, hemoperfusion therapy has been reported to be beneficial for alleviating symptoms and reducing mortality in severely ill COVID-19 patients. Hemoperfusion is a process of filtering blood to eliminate toxins and inflammatory factors from the body. This case series aims to high-light the unexpected adverse clinical and labora-tory outcomes in the majority of COVID-19 patients treated with hemoperfusion in our hospi-tal. We included fifteen patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with moderate-to-se-vere COVID-19 between August and December 2020 and were all given two to four sessions of hemoperfusion using the MG150 cartridge. All ten men and five women showed no improve-ment in their neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), ferritin, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein (CRP) values after the hemoperfusion regiments, both survivors and non-survivors. In addition, eleven out of twelve patients with respiratory failure who were then intubated resulted in death. Based on our findings and previous evi-dence, we recommended only performing hemoperfusion for investigational instead of therapeutic purposes due to its poorly under-stood pathophysiology in COVID-19. We also recommended further research regarding the us-age of hemoperfusion in COVID-19 patients, es-pecially in the matter of determining the best time to start the therapy.Copyright © 2023, The Indonesian Foundation of Critical Care Medicine. All rights reserved.

16.
Bulletin of Russian State Medical University ; - (2):43-49, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2228435

ABSTRACT

Severe form of COVID 19 has been linked to the phenomenon of dysregulated inflammation with excessive cytokine release and elevated interleukin 6 (IL6) levels. Suppressive agents enabling specific inhibition of cytokines, notably monoclonal antibodies to IL6 and its receptors, have been applied as a rescue therapy in COVID 19 despite the underexplored clinical scope for these biologic medications. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of IL6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab in moderate symptomatic COVID 19 prone to aggravation. The retrospective cohort study enrolled two groups of hospitalized patients (a total of n = 72) diagnosed with moderate COVID-19. The main group received a single 400 mg dose of tocilizumab (TCZ) on top of standard therapy. The comparative analysis included statistical evaluation for a number of clinical and laboratory parameters at reference time points and disease outcomes with regard to treatment strategy. Overall, TCZ administration provided no advantages in terms of oxygen supplementation status, disease progression, or survival. Lethal cases constituted 19.2% (10 pts) and 5% (1 pt) in TCZ and comparison groups, respectively. The results indicate that administration of monoclonal antibody drugs in hospital patients with COVID-19 must follow differential schemes with regard to the disease severity and comorbidities, as well as proper commencement schedules. Copyright © 2022 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University. All rights reserved.

17.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results ; 14:761-765, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2228263

ABSTRACT

Introduction: COVID-19, a new coronavirus illness, swiftly spread throughout all continents. However, evidence on all of COVID-19's indications and symptoms is lacking. Patients who have COVID-19 may be more susceptible to fungal infections. Mucormycosis is an uncommon and frequently fatal fungal illness caused by hyphae invading the bloodstream and causing thrombosis and necrosis. Material(s) and Method(s): Patients diagnosed with mucormycosis following a recent COVID-19 infection were included in the case series analysis. Surgical therapy was limited to individuals who tested negative for COVID-19 on PCR. To remove the infection, endoscopic, open, and combination techniques were used. For the first month after surgery, survivors were followed up on on a regular basis. Result(s): About 30 people with a history of Covid-19 were given dexamethasone and remdesivir in this study. Following therapy, these individuals developed mucormycosis, which was treated by Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS). As a consequence, 16 patients (53.34 %) had numerous operations. The most prevalent related condition was diabetes mellitus (60 %). The majority of the patients were men (60 %). Our patients had an average age of 55.53+/-8.093. 43.34 % of the people died. Conclusion(s): In conclusion, mucormycosis is a rare but critical problem complicating the later part of the clinical course of COVID-1, possibly due to improper drug usage during Covid treatment. Copyright © 2023 Authors. All rights reserved.

18.
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare ; 31(no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2232353

ABSTRACT

The most reported symptoms of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were initially fever, dry cough, and sore throat. However, as we continue to review the literature, the loss of taste and smell were also added as clinical symptoms of the novel SARS-CoV-2. At present, the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the auditory system is still not well-understood. This study is mini-review and aims to find out more about the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and hearing loss through review of the literature. From our findings, hearing loss is the primary otological symptom of SARS-CoV-2, followed by tinnitus and dizziness. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 may have an effect on our auditory system, but due to the small sample sizes in the existing literature, further prospective studies are warranted to determine the relationship between the virus and hearing loss. Copyright © The Author(s) 2022.

19.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results ; 13:7200-7205, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2229705

ABSTRACT

Background: The clinical manifestations in patients with COVID-19 may be nonspecific, but most have fever, cough, followed by dyspnea, fatigue, or sputum production. approximately 14% to 53% of patients experience various degrees of liver damage, although most of these injuries are mild and transient, with a satisfactory prognosis in patients without prior liver disease. In contrast, COVID-19 in patients with pre-existing liver disease has been reported to result in higher hospitalization and mortality rates. Among these pre-existing liver diseases, cirrhosis is a chronic liver disease that involves the collapse of the structure of the liver and distortion of the vascular architecture. Cirrhosis is associated with inherent immune dysfunction and an altered gut-liver axis;patients with cirrhosis are particularly at elevated risk of infections and the associated complications. It remains uncertain whether immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 have a higher risk of adverse outcomes. Patients with cancer or solid organ transplant recipients may have an elevated risk of more severe COVID-19;whereas patients taking biologic therapies may not have a greater risk of developing severe COVID-19. No additional risk of death was observed in cancer patients receiving active treatment except in those undergoing chemotherapy. Whether patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection are at higher risk of mortality due to COVID-19 is unclear.Limited evidence has shown that the clinical manifestations in cirrhotic patients with COVID-19 are similar to those in the general population with COVID-19, with fever and cough remaining the most common symptoms, followed by shortness of breath and sputum production. Interestingly, whereas similar proportions of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients developed respiratory and cardiovascular symptoms, cirrhotic patients were less likely to develop gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., diarrhea, nausea, vomiting). Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.

20.
Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents ; 36(Supplement 1):177-182, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2218535

ABSTRACT

In December 2019, in Wuhan (Hubei, China), the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) have been reported. On March 11th, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the pandemic. On July 1st, 2021, more than 180 million people had developed the disease, with more than 3.9 million deaths. In Italy, the most updated data show that, among all cases (n= 4.218.979) and deaths (n=125.058) due to COVID-19, 5.5% (n= 231.338) with 11 deaths concern the 0-9 years age group, while 9.6% (n= 406.460) with 15 deaths concern the 10-19 years age group. This review aims to present a comprehensive overview of COVID-19 in children. Copyright © by BIOLIFE, s.a.s.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL